Lesson 3 – Energy Efficiency Model based on PNW

One way the government could promote energy efficiency would be to establish broad policy initiatives that recognize energy efficiency as an energy resource. A model for this exists in the Pacific Northwest. In December 1980, Congress authorized the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, Public Law 96-501, which established the Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council, more commonly known as the Northwest Power and Conservation Council or the Council. (Ossmann, 2013) The following year, four states — Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington — agreed to make the Council an interstate agency for planning purposes and to provide policy leadership on energy and fish and wildlife issues. The Council develops plans in partnership with the states and general public which, when implemented, assure sustainability defined as including a safe, reliable and economical power supply with “due regard for the environment.” (Ossmann, 2013) The Council, through its regional planning process, often called the “regional dialog,” solicits broad public input and then works to develop a long-range plan that meets the region’s energy and environmental needs while balancing competing interests. In the planning process, energy efficiency has long been considered the least-cost energy resource and a more sustainable way to address increased need for generation brought on by a growing population and economy. In the 34 years since the Act was established, the region has saved more than 5,300 average megawatts, which would be the electricity needed to power five cities the size of Seattle. (Council, 2014) The federal government has also recognized the value of energy efficiency in the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule to reduce carbon emissions from power plants by 30 percent from 2005 levels by 2030. (EPA, 2014) The proposed rule sets emissions standards at the state level, encourages collaboration among states and recognizes the value in zero-emissions actions like energy efficiency and renewable energy in meeting those reduction standards. Clearly, the government is capable of establishing policy and then stepping aside to let regions, states or communities go to work on local solutions.

The Pacific Northwest has an effective planning process in place that helps guide energy and natural resource policies and practices. Energy efficiency is an integral part of that plan. For decades, utilities in the region have developed, implemented and promoted energy efficiency programs to help the region meet its sustainability goals. I think that model could be used to assist other regions in meeting the emissions reduction standards in the proposed rule. To move this idea forward, I would propose a business with the expertise available to establish regional versions of the Council. The entity would have representatives from each state and would be tasked with developing a regional plan for not only meeting the emissions standards from power plants, but to also give due consideration to the environment. Energy efficiency would be recognized as key in not only meeting the standards but in creating a more sustainable environment for the future.

Environmental Protection Agency. “Clean Power Plan Proposed Rule.” Retrieved 9/12/14 from http://www2.epa.gov/carbon-pollution-standards/clean-power-plan-proposed-rule

Northwest Power & Conservation Council. August 7, 2014. “Energy Efficiency Will Help Meet EPA’s Carbon Rules.” Retrieved 9/12/14 from https://www.nwcouncil.org/news/blog/energy-efficiency-will-help-meet-epa-carbon-rules/

Ossman, Sharon. January 16, 2013. Northwest Power & Conservation Council Bylaws. Retrieved 9/12/14 from https://www.nwcouncil.org/about/policies/bylaws/

4 thoughts on “Lesson 3 – Energy Efficiency Model based on PNW

  1. Hi Christine,
    I really enjoyed your post! I’ve never heard of this program, but it sounds amazingly successful. It’s programs like this that deserve more attention. That said, is this program in conjunction with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)? Or is it in a different measure entirely that goes above and beyond RPS?
    Thanks for the great information!
    Ken

    • Hi Ken. The energy efficiency programs and regional planning have been in place (and evolved) since the Northwest Power Act was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1980. This was well in advance of any Renewable Portfolio Standards passed by the states. The Act does not require standards. It is a mechanism for planning to meet the needs of the region, including energy efficiency, development of new energy resources to meet demand and addressing fisheries resources protection and enhancement. It is truly a fascinating example of how regional collaboration and solutions can work. When you have time, you may learn more at http://www.nwcouncil.org. Thanks for reading and commenting on my post.

  2. Yes, Marielle, considering energy conservation and efficiency as a resource in the Pacific Northwest has delayed and perhaps even avoided the need for developing new generation to meet projected, growing demand. It is considered — and I think rightfully so — the least-cost energy resource and I truly believe the model could be used in other areas to ease our dependence on fossil fuels and perhaps even postpone the need to build new generating plants. I appreciate your thoughts. Thanks for reading my post.
    Christy

  3. Hi Christine,
    I have never heard efficiency and conservation referred to as a resource before, interesting concept. It sounds like the concept has worked really well for them, since four states were added to the council within a year. I like your business idea as well. Energy efficiency and conservation make us less dependent on larger, more intensive sources of energy, which open the door for renewables as well.

    – Marielle

Leave a Reply