03_What Have We Learned

The government has great potential to promote energy efficiency through policies that have a strong emphasis on structural development, transportation, and education efforts. First, the government could create a benchmark for construction on new buildings and renovations to ensure that energy efficient projects are progressing. By enforcing more rigorous mandatory building codes on new buildings and renovation, the life cycle of the building would operate more energy efficiently. The “Unlocking Energy Efficiency in the US Economy Report” by McKinsey and Company displayed the state residential building codes on Exhibit 17. The inconsistency of the outdated residential standards needs to be restructured by new energy intensive policies. There should also be discounted energy audits or assessments for residential energy customers. As for industrial and commercial settings, there should be building codes and regulations concerning the existing building envelope and equipment. Perhaps, companies should be given building certificates or energy labels (such as Energy Star labels) that are to be displayed to the public and consumers. As a result, it could provide the company with an incentive to become more energy efficient. The building code mandate could let’s say equal E, and as the company becomes more energy efficient the letter grade would get closer to the letter A. In addition, there could also be yearly mandatory energy audits and assessments for companies. Next, the transportation sector must be rationalized by creating fuel efficiency mandates and producing tax credit policies that encourage people to buy more efficient vehicles. The government should introduce and regularly strengthen fuel efficiency standards for light-duty and heavy duty vehicles. Nationwide state vehicle emission tests and inspection tests should also be considered to ensure that vehicles are producing minimal amounts of air pollution. Finally, the advancement in education and awareness efforts should be a top priority of policy makers. Residents could receive information from local electricity providers about residential heating and cooling flaws and guides to make your house more energy efficient. There could also be activities in the communities to promote more efficient housing projects and showcase local energy efficient companies and partners. These methods would give the public a hands-on learning approach to reducing their energy costs. Overall, the types of policies that promote energy efficiency can vary; however, the resources and technology are readily available to begin making energy efficient policies in the residential, commercial, and industrial sectors.

If I were to develop a business, it would carry out government policies on structural mandates for new or outdated industrial and commercial buildings in order for them to receive the best energy label. First, I would heavily stress the importance of investing in the triple bottom line: planet, people, and profit. I would develop a business that would help companies start from bottom-up in energy efficiency. As a business, I could improve energy efficiency of existing buildings performing simple tasks such as performing energy audits and assessments, then making recommendations. I could also assist companies planning to construct new buildings and renovations by giving them some sustainable development blueprints dependent on their budget. Largely, if the government did create a building energy label and mandatory building codes; my business would help make other companies sustainability goals become reality.

Granade, Hanna. Jon Creyts. Anton Derkach. Philip Farese. Scott  Nyquist. “Unlocking Energy Efficiency In The US Economy”. 2009 July. Accessed Sept.9 2014 http://www.mckinsey.com/client_service/electric_power_and_natural_gas/latest_thinking/unlocking_energy_efficiency_in_the_us_economy

 

One thought on “03_What Have We Learned

  1. Hi Katie. I found your post fascinating and after reading it, I ended up delving into “Unlocking Energy Efficiency In The US Economy” in greater detail. The sections I read were interesting and educational; and I am looking forward to reading the full report in greater detail as time permits. Thank you for encouraging me to do so! I have spent nearly 30 years in the electric utility industry and currently manage a department that includes customer service, meter reading/billing, collections, energy conservation and communications. In your post, you mentioned that government could play a greater role in setting building standards for new construction and renovations based on the map showing the new building code variations by state. Did you notice that the 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided $3.1 billion in grants for state energy efficiency programs if the state developed a plan to adopt residential and commercial codes that met or exceeded the 2009 IECC standards (McKinsey and Company, 2009)? Perhaps that’s a start.
    A couple of other areas of the report immediately caught my interest. First, the report is one of the few I’ve read that mentions the effect energy efficiency has on retail rates. While energy efficiency and conservation are good for the environment and ultimately lower a consumer’s electric bill, it does present a challenge for the utility because fixed costs have to be reallocated across fewer kilowatt hours sold which ultimately leads to higher retail rates (McKinsey and Company, 2009. Page 104). The other section I found interesting was in the Executive Summary where the authors promote recognizing energy efficiency as an important energy resource and that we should develop and implement comprehensive plans that include proven, piloted and emerging approaches to unlock the full potential of energy efficiency. Both were part of my approach which, if you are interested, may be found at http://engr312.dutton.psu.edu/2014/09/12/lesson-3-energy-efficiency-model-based-on-pnw/. Great post. Thanks!

Leave a Reply